Justinian helps legal teams research controlling authority, test citations, draft motions, check procedure, and reconstruct litigation history without separating law from the record it came from.
Workflow
The work Justinian helps with
Find controlling authority on a litigation issue and summarize holdings with pinpoint source support.
Check whether cited cases still stand for the propositions claimed in a draft.
Draft motions, outlines, procedural memos, and research summaries grounded in forum rules.
Summarize litigation history, docket activity, agency challenges, and prior rulings.
Agent behavior
What the agent does differently
Traverses cases, dockets, filings, court rules, agency decisions, and citation edges.
Flags negative treatment, weak proposition support, and missing procedural steps.
Turns research into editable work product with citations ready for human review.
Handles long source sets by organizing the record before drafting.
Questions teams bring
The common asks are already mapped.
What authority controls in this forum?
Is this case still good law?
What deadline or rule governs the next step?
What has happened in similar agency litigation?
Source surface
The corpus behind this page
State and federal court records
Court opinions, dockets, entries, filings, and rules
Agency decisions and administrative procedure materials
Citation graph and uploaded litigation files
More government use cases